[asterisk-dev] [asterisk-commits] russell: branch bbryant/sip-tcptls r73108 - /team/bbryant/sip-tcptls/channels/

[Jeffrey C. Ollie]

On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 12:47 -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007 11:17, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> > Also, is there a point to defining it like a bitfield?  Unless you
> > are going to be 'or'ing and 'and'ing them together I think it makes
> > more sense to leave them as integers.
> 
> Bitfield makes sense along the lines of "Host A only supports UDP",
> "Host B only supports TCP", "Host C supports both UDP and TCP",
> etc.

True, but that's not the way it was being used in the code.

Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20070703/12783a6c/attachment.pgp