[asterisk-dev] G726
Tim Panton
tim at mexuar.com
Tue Feb 20 16:12:23 MST 2007
On 16 Feb 2007, at 23:45, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Steve Langstaff wrote:
>> I think that the sample packing order is different between g726 and
>> g726aal2.
>
> That is correct, it is essentially little-ending vs. big-ending
> packing
> of the encoded bits into bytes. That is why converting between them is
> so fast.
1.4/include/asterisk/frame.h has this as:
/*! ADPCM (G.726, 32kbps, RFC3551 codeword packing) */
#define AST_FORMAT_G726 (1 << 11)
But
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-guy-iax-02.txt under
Media Format Subclass Values
says:
0x00000800 | AMR | Variable
- All of the rest of the codecs match.
Is this a bug in asterisk or in the draft-rfc ?
Or are we putting a translation layer between the values IAX uses
externally
and that asterisk uses internally?
Tim.
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
Tim Panton
www.mexuar.net
www.westhawk.co.uk/
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list