[asterisk-dev] wcusb.c vs. wcfxsusb.c
Matthew Fredrickson
creslin at digium.com
Mon Feb 12 11:53:00 MST 2007
It's probably safe to remove it. wcusb was the version I wrote of that
driver since I found wcfxsusb to be pretty ugly.
Matthew Fredrickson
On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> The zaptel source tree has two different drivers for a certain USB FXS
> single-port device (S100U?). wcfxsusb.c seems to be old and
> unmaintained. Any reason for keeping it?
>
> --
> Tzafrir Cohen
> icq#16849755 jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
> +972-50-7952406 mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
> http://www.xorcom.com iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list