[asterisk-dev] wcusb.c vs. wcfxsusb.c

Matthew Fredrickson creslin at digium.com
Mon Feb 12 11:53:00 MST 2007


It's probably safe to remove it.  wcusb was the version I wrote of that 
driver since I found wcfxsusb to be pretty ugly.

Matthew Fredrickson

On Feb 11, 2007, at 7:55 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:

> The zaptel source tree has two different drivers for a certain USB FXS
> single-port device (S100U?). wcfxsusb.c seems to be old and
> unmaintained. Any reason for keeping it?
>
> -- 
>                Tzafrir Cohen
> icq#16849755                    jabber:tzafrir at jabber.org
> +972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
> http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list