[asterisk-dev] Unified Asterisk Interface

[Tilghman Lesher]

On Tuesday 11 December 2007 13:02:28 Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article <200712111053.16110.tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com>,
>
> Tilghman Lesher <tilghman at mail.jeffandtilghman.com> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 December 2007 10:16:31 Steven Critchfield wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 09:21 -0600, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
> > > > Well, if you're addicted to AGI, you're going to love 1.6, since
> > > > we've joined the boundary between live and dead mode and allowed an
> > > > AGI to make the transition.
> > >
> > > You mean we are going back to the earlier 1.4 days and before... Well
> > > the ability to not be killed when the transition is being made.
> >
> > No, you'll still get a HUP signal... but Asterisk will continue to
> > interact, should you survive that signal.  Currently, after you get the
> > signal, Asterisk just waits for your process to die before exiting.
>
> What happens with FastAGI instead of an AGI process?

Same, except that since there is no way to deliver a SIGHUP over a network
socket, no such signal will be (or is even now) delivered.

-- 
Tilghman