[asterisk-dev] Unified Asterisk Interface

[Moises Silva]

Also, with this patch I just added: http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11282

You can do AGI thru AMI, having a single interface :)

On Dec 10, 2007 11:20 AM, Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 17:40 +0100, David Roden wrote:
> > On Monday 10 December 2007 17:16:56 Jim Capp wrote:
> >
> > > Please check out the "asterisk-java" project:
> >
> > I am already using that. :)
> >
> > While it does indeed keep the low-level stuff away from me I still have to
> > worry about synchronization issues between the two APIs in use. I wrote my
> > own layer above asterisk-java so that at least these two APIs are hidden from
> > my application but--as I said--I'd prefer if there was The One Asterisk API I
> > could use instead. :)
> >
> > Would it be hard to include AMI commands like "ReadDTMF" that trigger
> > DTMFReadEvents or DTMFReadResponses as soon as the user pressed a key?
>
> So here is an interesting thought for those who want to essentially
> rewrite core functionality, You have the source and can rewite the core.
>
> I'll quickly appologise for what looks like a flaming start to the
> message, it is meant to be taken with no attitude and as just a flat
> statement of fact.
>
> If you want access to the core call handling like AGI, why not create
> your app down in the core of asterisk. Then you also end up with access
> to all those events that are exposed up to AMI as well.
>
> This one single API you wish to access is really in the core of
> asterisk.
> --
> Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>



-- 
"Within C++, there is a much smaller and cleaner language struggling
to get out."