[asterisk-dev] invasive fixes to chan_iax2 in 1.4

[Mihai Balea]

On Aug 17, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Mihai Balea wrote:

> This is a pretty bold move on a supposedly stable branch.   
> Unfortunately it is probably needed.  I just have a couple of  
> comments.
> - First of all, was astobj2 tested in any production environment or  
> this will be the first time it is used for real stuff?
> - I suggest you delay merging it in for a couple of days and give  
> us a chance to hammer on it for while.  I would be glad to subject  
> it to our stress tests.  However, our tests cover only a limited  
> part of IAX2 functionality, so I would suggest that anybody who can  
> help here, do so.   I know that Loic has a way of stress testing  
> registrations, maybe other people have other test environments as  
> well.
>
> Mihai

Hi all,

Just to follow up on my comments above... I've been testing Russell's  
iax_refcount branch (rev 80042) overnight using our stress test  
environment and so far it has been stable.

Mihai

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2411 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20070821/d2df5fe7/attachment.bin