[asterisk-dev] fork or pthread_atfork
Kevin P. Fleming
kpfleming at digium.com
Fri Apr 6 08:18:00 MST 2007
Yuan Qin wrote:
> The ast_log() will lock a mutex if appropriate, but the mutex may be in
> locked state already.
> Maybe we should use pthread_atfork() instead of fork() or never call
> some functions that hold mutex
> before execv() in child process.
pthread_atfork() does not fork, it does something entirely different.
Read the man page before suggesting we use it :-)
However, you have raised a very valid point... we cannot use
pthread-related functions for synchronization after forking, because we
are not running in the same process any longer. I will have someone look
into this, thanks for raising the issue!
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list