[asterisk-dev] SIP issue (chan_sip.c:7724 set_address_from_contact) with Nortel CS1K

Raj Jain rj2807 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 1 10:34:28 MST 2007


<sip:65602093;phone-context=*BLANKED*:5060;maddr=47.160.109.70
;transport=udp;user=phone>

The above URI seems syntactically incorrect to me. This is a tel URI
converted to a SIP URI. Agreed that anything before the @ sign (including
the semicolon) needs to treated opaquely as userinfo. The host, which is a
mandatory part of SIP URI, seems to be missing in the above URI.

Someone mentioned that there is an @host in the above URI. I can't see it.
What am I missing?

Raj


On 4/1/07, Olle E Johansson <olle at voop.com> wrote:
>
>
> 1 apr 2007 kl. 13.02 skrev Mikael Magnusson:
>
> > Olle E Johansson wrote:
> >> 30 mar 2007 kl. 23.52 skrev Christopher Thompson:
> >>> Contact: <sip:65602093;phone-context=*BLANKED*:
> >>> 5060;maddr=47.160.109.70;transport=udp;user=phone>
> >> This is the culprit. There's no @ sign in this contact. nortel has
> >> a way of implementing their own stuff, not really
> >> bothering about interoperability.
> >
> > Are you sure there isn't a @ in *BLANKED*? That would make it a
> > valid sip uri. Similar to the following from RFC 4504:
> >
> >     sip:5551234;phone-context=+1212 at example.net;user=phone
>
> If so, then we're back to us not correctly supporting ;parameters in
> the username part, which was supposed to be fixed.
>
> However, I'm sure it is fixed in Asterisk SPE 1.0B.
>
> /O
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-dev mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20070401/7901385d/attachment.htm


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list