[asterisk-dev] Call forward with CFU?

[Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk]

>>> divertingLegInformation2 is already defined in libpri (more than 2
>>> years ago) as Q.SIG message, so you should change
>>> your PRI switchtype option to qsig and change value of
>>> ROSE_DIVERTING_LEG_INFORMATION2 in libpri/pri_facility.h to 0x0f
>>> instead of 0x15.
>>
>> But why should I change that value?
>
> I don't know real reason why it was changed more than year ago  
> (http://svn.digium.com/view/libpri?rev=225&view=rev).
> Probably other signallings (like NI, etc.) uses the same structure  
> with different operation code.

Shouldn't that be fixed, then, by configuration? Hacking the source  
like this is quite ugly...

roy

---
"Humans mostly aren't particularly evil. They just get carried away  
by new ideas, like dressing up in jackboots and shooting people, or  
dressing up in white sheets and lynching people, or dressing up in  
tie-dye jeans and playing guitars at people"
  - Terry Pratchett
-------------------------------
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
roy at karlsbakk.net