[asterisk-dev] [PATCH] Silently drop non-conforming cirpack keep-alive packets

[Andrew Kohlsmith]

On Wednesday 31 May 2006 12:24, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> If it can be done in a way that doesn't negatively impact performance
> for other users, then sure, I can see it would be useful. Doing an
> excessive strcasecmp() call on the incoming packets is not
> zero-performance-impact :-)

Well yes -- that's why I wasn't suggesting that every single stupid vendor 
interop be implemented (since some I could envision would hopelessly tangle 
up chan_sip), but stupid little things like ignoring 1xx responses that would 
otherwise cause a call to fail and so on.

Yes a strcasecmp is not something that is always required, but as a stupid 
vendor option the only people who'd be impacted would be those with stupid 
vendors to interop with.

-A.