[asterisk-dev] Zaptel udev checking svn 1064

[Jeffrey C. Ollie]

On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 10:43 -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> 
> > Naming the file "10-zaptel.rules" should be sufficent.  The udev
> > documentation recommends that admins put locally created rules in
> > 10-local.rules.  What might be even better would be to allow the admin
> > to specify his/her own name:
> 
> I'm not opposed to that, but keep in mind that distros set their own
> policies regarding file name (Debian, for one, does not use numbered
> rules files at all).

Well, as long as it's easy to override the filename without editing the
Makefile the default doesn't matter to me...

Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20060518/0e141b9a/attachment.pgp