[asterisk-dev] Corydon76 Issue Deleted: 0006925, 04-28-06 17:49 Corydon76 Issue Deleted: 0006920

Andrey S. Pankov casper at casper.org.ua
Mon May 1 12:13:18 MST 2006


Tilghman Lesher wrote:

>I'm not quite sure why Casper seems to have such a problem; I have
>committed several of his patches, most of them fairly recently.  What

Thank you for that!

>I have also done, however, is to reject some of his patches.  I'm not

Did you really? I don't remember...

>sure why he thinks this is a personal attack.  I think I've outlined

Oh, no, I don't think so. I'm very surprised nobody at Digium tell you
about the amount of complains about your behavior. I can agree that
sometimes you are right, but it happens that you are not. I welcome
your activity on the bugtracker and I know all of us need a bugmarshall
like you. But as Denis asked please always explain why you think like
this or do not think so. Let's see what happend on 6920 and 6925.

6920: [patch] detect pwlib in autoconf_and_menuselect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
kpfleming - 04-11-06 17:19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I mentioned in the other bug report, please attempt to work directly
with the maintainers of all 'developer' branches, not via the bug tracker.
This system is for dealing with issues in supported versions of Asterisk
only.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
casper - 04-28-06 16:27
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I reopen it since pwlib detection is still uncomplete/not functional...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Corydon76 - 04-28-06 16:36
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I reclose it.

04-11-06 17:19  kpfleming      Status                   new => resolved
04-11-06 17:19  kpfleming      Resolution               open => fixed
04-11-06 17:19  kpfleming      Assigned To               => kpfleming
04-11-06 17:19  kpfleming      Note Added: 0044169
04-11-06 17:19  kpfleming      Status                   resolved => closed
04-28-06 16:27  casper         Status                   closed => feedback
04-28-06 16:27  casper         Resolution               fixed => reopened
04-28-06 16:27  casper         Note Added: 0044851
04-28-06 16:36  Corydon76      Note Added: 0044854
04-28-06 16:36  Corydon76      Status                   feedback => closed
04-28-06 16:36  Corydon76      Resolution               reopened => no change
required
04-28-06 17:49  Corydon76      Issue Deleted: 0006920

6925: [patch] Makefile update for autoconf_and_menuselect
----------------------------------------------------------------------
kpfleming - 04-11-06 17:12
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry, we do not accept patches via the bug tracker for development
branches that are not intended for public use. If you wish to assist in
the development of a new feature that is living in a branch, please
contact one of its maintainers about working directly with them, otherwise
the bug marshals will have no idea what to do with your submissions (nobody
can comment or commit them except the maintainer(s) of that branch).

----------------------------------------------------------------------
casper - 04-28-06 16:25
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I reopen it to add a patch for trunk...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Corydon76 - 04-28-06 16:36
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reclosed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
casper - 04-28-06 17:04
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd ask you to assign it to someone (e.g. russell) and work on something
other, hopefully more useful than closing bugs you are not supposed to
close. Thanks!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Corydon76 - 04-28-06 17:45
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were told very specifically by kpfleming not to reopen this bug.  DO
NOT REOPEN THIS BUG OR FILE ANYTHING SIMILAR NEW.

04-11-06 17:12  kpfleming      Status                   new => resolved
04-11-06 17:12  kpfleming      Resolution               open => no change
required
04-11-06 17:12  kpfleming      Assigned To               => kpfleming
04-11-06 17:12  kpfleming      Note Added: 0044168
04-11-06 17:12  kpfleming      Status                   resolved => closed
04-28-06 16:25  casper         Status                   closed => feedback
04-28-06 16:25  casper         Resolution               no change required =>
reopened
04-28-06 16:25  casper         Note Added: 0044850
04-28-06 16:36  Corydon76      Note Added: 0044855
04-28-06 16:36  Corydon76      Status                   feedback => closed
04-28-06 16:36  Corydon76      Resolution               reopened => won't fix
04-28-06 17:04  casper         Status                   closed => feedback
04-28-06 17:04  casper         Resolution               won't fix => reopened
04-28-06 17:04  casper         Note Added: 0044858
04-28-06 17:45  Corydon76      Note Added: 0044859
04-28-06 17:45  Corydon76      Status                   feedback => closed
04-28-06 17:45  Corydon76      Resolution               reopened => won't fix
04-28-06 17:49  Corydon76      Issue Deleted: 0006925

As we can see you were not right in both cases. Where can you see that I was
"told very specifically by kpfleming not to reopen this bug"? Aren't you aware
of the fact autoconf support in on the trunk branch now, are you? Moreover,
as I can suspect, not only Kevin or Russell were interested in looking at that,
but the current H323 support maintainer Jeremy. Did we give him a chance to do
so if the bug is closed? I explianed why I reopen both bugreports and you
deleted both with "won't fix" and "no change" resolution. If I reopen something
I'm sure I do the right thing and I explain why I think so.

The fact we have 320 open bugs does not give you the right to close or delete
results of the work done by others. If you are not interested in a patch does
not mean others are not too. We do not have a separate patch upload tool. Can
you imagine a developer posting a 150-200KB patch to a mailing list for review?
Mailing lists are for another purpose, they are for discussions.

Tilghman, you childish behavior is damaging the project. (c) anonymous Asterisk
developer. I'd ask you to be more reasonable and to make public your reasons in
acting this or that way. That's the only thing we'd like to ask you (me and
other developers I have private mail exchange with). And thanks for the work
you are doing.

In the hope not to raise flames but be considered reasonably,
faithfully yours,
Andrey S Pankov (casper)



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list