[asterisk-dev] Re: Reconsider bug 6316?

Wed Mar 15 10:11:17 MST 2006

On Wednesday, March 15, 2006 4:56 PM Tony Mountifield wrote: 

> Isn't your "N" just the "c" option with the opposite logic?

It is indeed. That would explain why I implemented the "n" option the way I
did... :-) Long long time ago. I honestly simply forgot. "n" will suffice.

How do we proceed? The bug is reopened and Corydon76 assigned it to himself
again. So we are back where we left of two months ago without new arguments
on either side. Now what?

Kind regards,
 JP
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3104 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20060315/46438f27/smime.bin