[asterisk-dev] IAX internet draft (draft-guy-iax-00)

[Adrian Sietsma]

Tim Panton wrote:
> 
...
(amended)
>
> Yes. Quite right, there is a problem here, The way we've implemented 
>  this
> is that iseq is set to the highest value+1 of all contiguously  
> received
> frames.
> So if we see a frame sequence
> 1,2,4,5 then iseq sticks at 3
>
> but if we get 1,2,3,4,5 then it is 4
>
>
>> -SteveK
>>
>> You're right, Dimitri.  I'm guessing he meant to type the sequence 
>> 1,2,4,5,3 which would be illustrative of what happens when you receive 
>> out-of-order full frames.

surely 1,2,4,5,3 would stick at 3, according to the def'n above ?

but if 1,2,3,5,4 then it is 4

If that is so,then how do frames 4 & 5 ever get acked ?

Adrian