[asterisk-dev] t.38

[Steve Underwood]

Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

>Steve Underwood wrote:
>
>  
>
>>When doing this testing, can you consider including my latest patch that
>>I attached to bug 5090 on the bug tracker. If that goes into 1.4, later
>>expansion to full T.38 should not require additional infrastructure
>>changes.
>>    
>>
>
>Absolutely. I'll mention it to Matt tomorrow, if he doesn't already know
>about it.
>
>Also, the generic jitterbuffer was merged today, which also added some
>timing fields to ast_frame objects, so I'm curious if that will have
>some impact on your requirements (no, I have not really looked over your
>code very much yet... sorry :-()
>  
>
One other issue that is still in the bug tracker is the maximum fax rate 
field in chan_sip.c, which seems to be based on a misunderstanding of 
what the field might contain.

Steve