[asterisk-dev] t.38

[David Hindmarsh]

Hi Guys,

Was the outcome of this testing posted anywhere.

What is the status of T.38 in Trunk at present?


Cheers
DAve

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Steve
Underwood
Sent: Friday, 2 June 2006 10:12 AM
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] t.38


Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

>Steve Underwood wrote:
>
>  
>
>>When doing this testing, can you consider including my latest patch that
>>I attached to bug 5090 on the bug tracker. If that goes into 1.4, later
>>expansion to full T.38 should not require additional infrastructure
>>changes.
>>    
>>
>
>Absolutely. I'll mention it to Matt tomorrow, if he doesn't already know
>about it.
>
>Also, the generic jitterbuffer was merged today, which also added some
>timing fields to ast_frame objects, so I'm curious if that will have
>some impact on your requirements (no, I have not really looked over your
>code very much yet... sorry :-()
>  
>
One other issue that is still in the bug tracker is the maximum fax rate 
field in chan_sip.c, which seems to be based on a misunderstanding of 
what the field might contain.

Steve

_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev


-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 21/07/2006

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date: 21/07/2006