[asterisk-dev] Zap channel naming is way too confusing

[Tilghman Lesher]

On Wednesday 22 February 2006 15:10, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> I don't believe that nobody else has an opinion about this...
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:53:57PM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > - Channel 4:17
> > - Channel 4:1
> > - Channel 4:7
> > - Zap/4:17
> > - Zap/1:31
> > - Zap/4:18
> >
> > What do you think?

Keep in mind that when people don't voice opinions, it's usually because
they don't feel strongly either way.  My personal take is that it looks
fine, but I'm waiting to see the proposed patch on the bugtracker (or
for someone who feels a little more strongly about this).

-- 
Tilghman