[asterisk-dev] iLBC packet loss concealment

[Denis Smirnov]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:46:15AM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:

KPF> However... this option will cause any 'direct conversion' that is
KPF> possible to be avoided. There are not any current 'direct conversions'
KPF> available except for alaw <-> ulaw, though. I will think today about
KPF> changing this option to only take effect when the translation path
KPF> already goes via SLIN, so that 'direct conversions' that may be
KPF> available are not skipped.

If it be done, that option would not needed, and it be very nice thing.

-- 
JID: ds at im.seiros.ru
ICQ: 58417635 (please, use jabber, if you can)

http://freesource.info/