[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes

[Jeremy McNamara]

jason justman wrote:

> jeremy, you are nitpicking at semantics - nothing gives up a noble 
> position like having to resort to now the subtle details.  its a 
> losing position, and you should be the one to retract, not sergio.
>


Subtle details is what lawyers like to nitpick.


> from observering the diff's, the flow of the swtich statement is 
> enough to convince me that north was tainted in his knowledge of how 
> chan_sccp is designed and operational.
>

WRONG -  Defining the SoftKeyTemplates is a a very specific SCCP 
operation.   Just because chan_sccp did it first does not mean they 
'own' it nor does it mean that North needed to look at chan_sccp to 
figure out the very standard C code to pull off the same exact operation.



> jeremy, it would be best if you let go of this whole issue, and allow 
> sergio to do what he feels is right - not to be strong armed into 
> forcing him under the "public record".



So then I let it go and North's work won't be able to be put in to 
Asterisk?   I don't think so.



Jeremy McNamara