[asterisk-dev] chan_skinny fixes

[Jeremy McNamara]

Michiel van Baak wrote:

>Ok people.
>
>I tried to ignore this thread as long as possible.
>But here I am, as you, wasting my time in an endless
>argument.
>Cant we just forget it and move on?
>
>It is clear Sergio doesn't want his code in svn right now,
>and north wants a working skinny driver in svn.
>Both valid reasons. Too bad we cannot benefit from a project
>done by both, but that's how it is.
>
>Shouldn't we stop talking and start testing/coding ?
>  
>


This is about his accusation that North's work is based on chan_sccp, 
which nobody but Sergio can see - So I am asking him for the proof.


Jeremy McNamara