[Asterisk-Dev] ast_xxx function..?

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Matt Hess wrote:

> I agree.. it would allow a rfc-broken device to function properly and on 
> that reason alone should not be done. As a counter-point to that.. 
> doesn't asterisk put in stuff to inter-operate better with other almost 
> rfc compliant devices?

Yes, but only when it doesn't cause a performance penalty or maintenance 
burden.

> I guess my first step then is to display the nonce value being claimed 
> as stale.

Sounds like a good idea!