[Asterisk-Dev] Re: asterisk 'stable'?
Tony Mountifield
tony at softins.clara.co.uk
Thu Sep 22 01:44:59 MST 2005
In article <4328802B.1060108 at digium.com>,
Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming at digium.com> wrote:
> Steven Critchfield wrote:
>
> > It isn't named wrong, you are using the incorrect definition. Consider
> > it a failure of the english language to have multiple semi conflicting
> > definitions for the same word.
> >
>
> And we're already responded multiple times that we realize that using
> 'stable' was a poor choice and that we won't be using it any longer for
> releases.
I haven't yet heard or seen anyone propose a better alternative...
> However, some people continue to harp on this with no obvious
> purpose in mind other than to generate mailing list activity...
Perhaps they just disagree that "stable" is a poor choice and are hoping
to sway opinion. Mailing list activity is a side-effect, not the goal.
Cheers
Tony
--
Tony Mountifield
Work: tony at softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: tony at mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list