[Asterisk-Dev] asterisk 'stable'?

[Steven Critchfield]

On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 14:32 -0500, Nathan C. Smith wrote:
> 
> It's just named wrong, it should be Asterisk 'snapshot'.  "better the devil
> you know".

It isn't named wrong, you are using the incorrect definition. Consider
it a failure of the english language to have multiple semi conflicting
definitions for the same word.

Stable here is as it is in the Debian world, little change. Consider
that nitroglycerin is stable chemical as long as it isn't subjected to
any jostling. But jostle it wrongly and it will blow up.

> >> well, still, 'stable' imho should be STABLE, not just a figgin  
> >> feature freeze
> >> perhaps it's time for reforming?

-- 
Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>