[Asterisk-Dev] asterisk 'stable'?

[Kevin P. Fleming]

Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> the asterisk 1.0 is named stable, and as i've been told that's  because 
> it's feature-frozen.

And we've already decided to stop using that nomenclature for future 
releases.

> will there ever bee a STABLE asterisk, as in 'does not crash'?

What else do you have in your life that is perfect and never experiences 
any problems? Of those things, how many of them are as configurable and 
run on as wide a variety of systems as Asterisk does?

Let's be a little realistic here, OK?