[Asterisk-Dev] say.c cleanup
Luigi Rizzo
rizzo at icir.org
Wed Jul 13 08:09:03 MST 2005
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 08:35:53AM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > as you see, if ast_streamfile() fails, ast_stopstream() is not called.
> > Can someone explain which way is correct or whether they
> > are equivalent ?
>
> There is no harm in calling ast_stopstream() if ast_streamfile() failed,
> since chan->stream will be empty. However, there is no value in calling
> in that situation either :-)
ok a related question is, why the code wants both descriptors > -1
to call ast_waitstream_full() ? The function seems to accept all
combinations...
Nevertheless, i will start impementing the function as it is and
fix it later...
cheers
luigi
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list