[Asterisk-Dev] Asterisk mailing lists.

Steven Critchfield critch at basesys.com
Thu Jan 27 11:08:52 MST 2005


On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 10:55 -0700, Dan Adams wrote:
> I would put my vote in for this, even though I will probably subscribe to 
> both head and stable lists, I think it would be great for sorting what the 
> message is about, since the subject of the message would containg head or 
> stable.

How about not splitting the list but rather forcing the users to put a
tag in the subject that was either [HEAD] or [STABLE] and a filter that
rejects any non conforming message back to the original poster with a
copy of posting guidelines. Either they would learn to read them or they
wouldn't get to clog our boxes.  

> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Jerris, Michael MI wrote:
> 
> > I personally like Asterisk-HEAD and renaming the users list
> > Asterisk-STABLE.  The issue is how do we get Dev to really be a source
> > code based forum, not the place people go to discuss bugs?
> >
> > Asterisk-STABLE:  discussion of configuration, bugs, and issues with
> > Asterisk Stable branch.  If you run stable and are having a problem,
> > post here.
> > Asterisk-HEAD:  discussion of configuration, bugs, and issues with
> > Asterisk HEAD branch.  If you run HEAD and are having a problem, post
> > here.  Maybe also a place to discuss new feature requests without
> > attached patches to support, or does that belong in DEV?  I am guessing
> > here because there will be a high signal:noise on these as many are
> > really "How do I do x" when it comes down to it that it should probably
> > stay here.
> > Asterisk-Dev:  Discussion of sourcecode, API's, features in development,
> > issues currently in Mantis and such,
> > not for bug reports (even if it is an "issue in the code"), operational
> > questions, or feature requests without code?
> >

-- 
Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list