[Asterisk-Dev] is this a bug?

Brian West brian at bkw.org
Tue Jan 25 22:35:02 MST 2005


Do not use 0.59s use 0.59r and do not install form portage.  0.59s (the s
must stand for SHIT)  because it doesn't work right.  

bkw

> -----Original Message-----
> From: asterisk-dev-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-dev-
> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth Long
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:15 PM
> To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Dev] is this a bug?
> 
> 
> --- Tuyan Ozipek <tuyan at sunkom.com> wrote:
> 
> > yesterdays cvs-stable *without* any patchs
> >
> > Asterisk Ready.
> > Asterisk Malloc Debugger Started (see
> > /var/log/asterisk/mmlog)
> > Beginning asterisk shutdown....
> > Beginning asterisk shutdown....
> > Executing last minute cleanups
> >   == Destroying any remaining musiconhold processes
> > Jan 26 01:40:09 DEBUG[9342]: res_musiconhold.c:644
> > ast_moh_destroy:
> > killing 9348!
> > Ouch ... error while writing audio data: : Broken
> > pipe
> > Segmentation fault
> >
> > seems to be a moh/mpg321 related *crash*
> >
> >
> mine:
> bash-2.05b$ mpg123 --version
> Version 0.59s-r9 (2000/Oct/27)
> bash-2.05b$
> 
> I got a compile warning about having the wrong
> release... "r9" instead of not having "r9"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
> http://my.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev




More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list