[Asterisk-Dev] video in iax2 spec
Nick Bachmann
asterisk at not-real.org
Sat Apr 30 15:05:54 MST 2005
Derek Smithies wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>
>>>I think the RTP header used in H323 for video works very well, and should
>>>be used in the video packets. Yes, I know RTP headers take up bytes.
>>>However, given that we are sending compressed video, an extra couple of
>>>bytes are not going to "break the bank".
>>>
>>'m not sure that encapsulating RTP inside of IAX is necessarily going
>>to be a good idea; you basically will then end up with multiple
>>timestamps, and stuff like that. I'd just get the data portion (payload)
>>to be the same, and then it should be as easy to translate the headers
>>as it is for audio.
>>
>>
>the advantage of putting the rtp header in the video frame is when you are
>changing voip protocols (eg, from h323 to iax2) It becomes easy then to
>get the conversion to work reliably. Which is what we want - is it not -
>reliability of conversion?
> The second advantage of using the rtp header is that the packet format
>(across all video formats) becomes consistant.
>
>
If you're so gung-ho about RTP, just use SIP. In my mind, the greatest
advantage of IAX is that it isn't encumbered by nonsense.
Nick
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list