[Asterisk-Dev] backporting persisent queues?

[Dinesh Nair]

as would i. for many of us, the importance of running a stable asterisk 
cant be oversaid. at the same time, some of the features from current are 
just as attractive. backporting the more stable ones to run on stable as an 
additional patch set is a wonderful compromise.

--dinesh

On 04/09/05 07:36 Brian West said the following:
> I would agree on this one.
> 
> /b
> 
> On Apr 8, 2005, at 3:23 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>>
>>> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>>>
>>>> would it take much to backport persistent queues to 1.0.x?
>>>
>>>
>>> No, it's a pretty easy feature to port.
>>
>>
>> However, it should NOT go into the Stable CVS tree. I would advocate
>> setting up a "stable-backports" directory with patches that people can
>> apply if they wish.
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> -- 
>>     Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
>>          http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
>>                              KP-216-121-ST
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
>> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> 

-- 
Regards,                           /\_/\   "All dogs go to heaven."
dinesh at alphaque.com                (0 0)    http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do                                        |
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b."  |
| done; done                                                              |
+=========================================================================+