[Asterisk-Dev] iax2 debug display problem?

Rich Adamson radamson at routers.com
Thu Apr 7 15:37:12 MST 2005


> From: Steve Kann <stevek at stevek.com>

> Rich Adamson wrote:
> 
> >Thanks Steve. How about just adding a new-line at the end of that
> >string so it doesn't mess up the remainder of the debug stuff?
> >  
> >
> Each character is printed when a frame is pulled out of the 
> jitterbuffer.  So, the strings are each one character long.   So, you 
> could add a newline before each of the regular IAX2 debug things, but it 
> would be easier to just make it possible to enable/disable these things 
> separately..

Okay, can you take care of that some time or do you want me to enter
a bug on it?

Rich


> >------------------------
> >  
> >
> >>Those letters are monitoring for the jitterbuffer.  They've been 
> >>described before.
> >>
> >>It could be made into an option to iax2 debug; i.e. iax2 debug 
> >>jitterbuffer and iax2 no debug jitterbuffer or something..
> >>
> >>-SteveK
> >>
> >>
> >>Rich Adamson wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>RHv9 system, CVS-HEAD-04/07/05
> >>>
> >>>When "iax2 debug" is executed to observe an incoming iax call, cli shows:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Rx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 008 ISeqno: 012 Type: IAX     Subclass: LAGRP
> >>>  Timestamp: 20010ms  SCall: 00119  DCall: 00001 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 012 ISeqno: 009 Type: IAX     Subclass: ACK
> >>>  Timestamp: 20010ms  SCall: 00001  DCall: 00119 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>LvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvRx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 009 ISeqno: 012 Type: DTMF
> >>>   Subclass: 3
> >>>  Timestamp: 20563ms  SCall: 00119  DCall: 00001 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 012 ISeqno: 010 Type: IAX     Subclass: ACK
> >>>  Timestamp: 20563ms  SCall: 00001  DCall: 00119 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>vvvvvvovvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvLvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvRx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 010 ISe
> >>>qno: 012 Type: DTMF    Subclass: 0
> >>>  Timestamp: 21363ms  SCall: 00119  DCall: 00001 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 012 ISeqno: 011 Type: IAX     Subclass: ACK
> >>>  Timestamp: 21363ms  SCall: 00001  DCall: 00119 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>vvvvvovLvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvRx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 011 ISeqno: 012 Ty
> >>>pe: DTMF    Subclass: 0
> >>>  Timestamp: 21963ms  SCall: 00119  DCall: 00001 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 012 ISeqno: 012 Type: IAX     Subclass: ACK
> >>>  Timestamp: 21963ms  SCall: 00001  DCall: 00119 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>vvvvvovvvvvvvvvvvvvvLvvvvvvvvvvvvvvRx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 012 ISeqno: 01
> >>>2 Type: DTMF    Subclass: 0
> >>>  Timestamp: 22623ms  SCall: 00119  DCall: 00001 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 012 ISeqno: 013 Type: IAX     Subclass: ACK
> >>>  Timestamp: 22623ms  SCall: 00001  DCall: 00119 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>vvvvov  == CDR updated on IAX2/livevoip at 217.160.244.186:4569-1
> >>>   -- Executing Dial("IAX2/livevoip at 217.160.244.186:4569-1", "SIP/3000|15") in
> >>>new stack
> >>>   -- Called 3000
> >>>vvvvvvvvvvvvv    -- SIP/3000-2eaf is ringing
> >>>Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 012 ISeqno: 013 Type: CONTROL Subclass: RINGING
> >>>  Timestamp: 23006ms  SCall: 00001  DCall: 00119 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>vvvvvRx-Frame Retry[ No] -- OSeqno: 013 ISeqno: 013 Type: IAX     Subclass: ACK
> >>>
> >>>  Timestamp: 23006ms  SCall: 00119  DCall: 00001 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
> >>>vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvLvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
> >>>vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvLvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvLvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
> >>>vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvLvvvvv    -- SIP/3000-2eaf answ
> >>>ered IAX2/livevoip at 217.160.244.186:4569-1
> >>>Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 013 ISeqno: 013 Type: CONTROL Subclass: (255?)
> >>>  Timestamp: 29016ms  SCall: 00001  DCall: 00119 [217.160.244.186:4569]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Should I open a bug report for the above?
> >>>
> >>>Rich
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> >>>Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> >>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >>>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >>>
> >>> 
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> >>Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> >>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >---------------End of Original Message-----------------
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> >Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> 

---------------End of Original Message-----------------





More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list