[Asterisk-Dev] Kernel 2.6.8-1.521 from Fedora C2

shabanip shabanip at avapajoohesh.com
Thu Sep 9 08:16:08 MST 2004


no need to do this.
just get the fresh 2.6.8.1 kernel and compile it on FC2.
everything will run OK now
- shabanip

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Micha? Mosiewicz" <mimo at proinet.pl>
To: <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:38 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Dev] Kernel 2.6.8-1.521 from Fedora C2


> I've noticed problems with zaptel on various kernel from Fedora C2. Most 
> of
> the time I had some core dumps from tools like ztcfg. My TDM400P cards
> denied working.
>
> I have found out that the problem was actually a UNIT(file) macro
> calculation. The way it is done, it returns very strange results without
> logic like for example 60909 at least on my "stock" Fedora C2 upgraded to
> the latest kernel.
>
> Then I noticed that most functions with fingerprint like (struct inode
> *inode, struct file *file) could probably use inode directly instead of
> reaching it from file. Actually it appears that inode data is proper, i.e.
> it has a proper i_rdev value, proper i_ino value etc. As contrary
> file->f_dentry->d_inode seems to have some bogus data.
>
> So, I changed all the function that used UNIT(file) calculation to
> MINOR(inode->i_rdev) whereever it was possible (i.e. wherever the function
> alread had inode parameter.
>
> I'm not Linux kernel hacker, and I didn't traced those function to any
> greater depth. Can somebody check this patch? I wonder why there are 
> people
> using FC2 and no one experienced such problems.
>
> --- /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/zaptel-1.0-RC2/zaptel.c 2004-07-28
> 17:16:14.000000000 -0400
> +++ ./zaptel.c 2004-09-09 10:30:16.000000000 -0400
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
> #endif
>
> /* macro-oni for determining a unit (channel) number */
> -#define UNIT(file) MINOR(file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_rdev)
> +#define UNIT(file) (MINOR(file->f_dentry->d_inode->i_rdev))
>
> /* names of tx level settings */
> static char *zt_txlevelnames[] = {
> @@ -2124,7 +2124,7 @@
> static int zt_specchan_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, int
> unit, int inc)
> {
>  int res = 0;
> -
> + printk( "Doint specchan_open unit: %i \n", unit);
>  if (chans[unit] && chans[unit]->sig) {
>  /* Make sure we're not already open, a net device, or a slave device */
>  if (chans[unit]->flags & ZT_FLAG_OPEN)
> @@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@
>
> static int zt_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> - int unit = UNIT(file);
> + int unit = MINOR(inode->i_rdev);
>  struct zt_chan *chan;
>  /* Minor 0: Special "control" descriptor */
>  if (!unit)
> @@ -2511,7 +2511,7 @@
>
> static int zt_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> - int unit = UNIT(file);
> + int unit = MINOR(inode->i_rdev);
>  int res;
>  struct zt_chan *chan;
>
> @@ -4154,7 +4154,7 @@
>
> static int zt_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, unsigned int
> cmd, unsigned long data)
> {
> - int unit = UNIT(file);
> + int unit = MINOR(inode->i_rdev);
>  struct zt_chan *chan;
>  struct zt_timer *timer;
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> 





More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list