[Asterisk-Dev] Time to lock down v1.1?

[Greg Boehnlein]

On Fri, 28 May 2004, Steven Critchfield wrote:

> As version numbers are just arbitrary pointers at a point in source code
> time, don't get too worried about the label. To make all those that are
> currently making noise happy, maybe it should be put forth that current
> stable has a version number and is abandoned. Then you place a new
> feature freeze on -head and fork a new -head off and go from there. 
> 
> It will not address software quality, but it will make some people
> happier to see version increments. Also it might get some of those who
> wouldn't run a cvs version ever to install a more recent tagged release.
> At this point it is easier to diagnose some of those problems. 

Why not simply mirror the Linux development method?

-- 
    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
                             KP-216-121-ST