[Asterisk-Dev] Half installed on Sparc: Drivers for FXO card refusing to install.

[Johan Daumerie]

Hi, 

I'm trying to get * installed on a netra X1 myself, would it be possible to
give me some more info on how far you've gotten, I'm running debian Sparc
port kernel 2.6 myself and have gooten up to the point where I have my *
build but looks like it's not like it should be outgoing calls loose speech
path after few seconds, can route incoming calls etc...

Would appreciate some external input.

Greetings,

Johan




-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-dev-admin at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-dev-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of dking at pimpsoft.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 01:41 AM
To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Half installed on Sparc: Drivers for FXO card
refusing to install.


My problem it seems may be Kernel Based. So I am trying to get a good 
one compiled right now with all the support Asterisk needs. After I 
make the correct .deb where should I upload it in case others need 
it?

I noticed the formatting was off for the includes as well, ugly but 
once I get these drivers installed it will work, then I may the 
motivation I need to help by fixing the issues I was having.

If '-mcpu' was used instead of '-march' it would take care of most of 
the make file problems I was having as well as update the current 
Makefile system to be more portable.

I don't have the option of using a external gateway as I understand 
it; As I said I'm still ignorant on a number of key points; I have 
allot to learn but that is half the fun after all.

So how does one get write access to the cvs anyway? I'm going to need 
a way to submit my changes if I get that far.

 - Belgarath

On 5 Jul 2004 at 10:56, Bob Knight wrote:
> Use an external gateway and you should be ready to go.
> I use mediatrix 1204's and now that I have them almost working with
> mbrowse, I no longer meed a damn windows box to configure them.
> 
> I think I am crazier than you.  Over a year ago I managed to build
> it on a ultra 5 sprac running solaris.  I went back and tried it a few
> months ago and it was just ifdef hell.  The code is just sooooo not
> set up for porting.  Way too ugly for me.
> 
> I still think a good solaris port may come in handy some day.
> It would be fun to see just how large an * system you could build on
> a big sun server.  I much prefer tightly coupled architectures over
> loosely coupled.  I know tightly vs loosely is about like arguing
> over abortion, so I won't go into that.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Bob Knight
> [-w] the work option
> bk at minusw.com
> 925-449-9163
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> 




_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev