[Asterisk-Dev] benevolent dictatorship, or inclusive developper community?

Florian Overkamp florian at obsimref.com
Thu Jan 8 12:31:18 MST 2004


Citeren "C. Maj" <cmaj at freedomcorpse.info>:
> They don't have to.  Only the developers who want to keep
> their own branches would.  Their bleeding stuff could be
> pushed back into Digium's repository, for example, and
> run BK2CVS on it there for the masses.

Interestingly enough, I had been looking for ways to do exactly that (keeping 
my own 'stable' tree that is somewhere between latest tarball and cvs, 
possibly also containing a few evolving patches. Be it with CVS, SubVersion, 
BitKeeper or whatever. Can you elaborate a little about how that should be 
done ? 


More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list