[Asterisk-Dev] benevolent dictatorship, or inclusive developper community?

[Martin Kihlgren]

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:32:41PM -0500, John Todd wrote:
[snip]
> 	4) Branch Asterisk to a new CVS server somewhere else that is 
> then more exposed to various programmers
> 
> Number 4 is the least likely and "worst" option in the tree, but I 
> include it as an option to be complete.
[snip]

Im not that convinced.. I believe it would do * good to finally accept that
it is in fact a split project allready - one digium-non-gpl-branch payed for
by digium customers, and one gpl-branch for everyone else.

More importantly, however, it would allow for more contributions, and more
evenly split workload for the participating developers.

Solution 3) does this also - and is perhaps better, since it wouldnt
alienate the digium folks, who have done one heck of a job so far.

But solution 1) or 2) would in the long run have the same problems we have
today - and are only superior if combined with 3) or 4) (IMHO).

//Martin

-- 
###################################################################
My idea of roughing it is when room service is late.
###################################################################
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20040107/e0e2de41/attachment.pgp