[Asterisk-Dev] 16 KHz audio ?
Steve Underwood
steveu at coppice.org
Fri Dec 17 10:08:30 MST 2004
Eric Bart wrote:
>>>Please read this skype experience:
>>>http://www.vonage-forum.com/article312.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Isn't marketing material wonderful? :-)
>>
>>
>
>Oops. Is Vonage now selling Skype ?
>
>Whatever. I've tested Skype. I'm telling it's HiFi !!!
>
>
>
>
>>>Skype may be using a 24 KHz bandwidth. I know that they're also using
>>>a very good compression codec.
>>>
>>>
>>I think 24kbps is rather more likely than 24kHz bandwidth :-)
>>
>>
>No. I read in a forum that someone saw that Skype was opening a sound card
>driver at 48KHz. Why would it if not for using it ?
>
>
They do that because few sound cards can sample at 16k/second. They use
48k/second and rate convert in software. The codec isn't using 24kHz
bandwidth.
>It's not because you're sampling at 48K that you'll get a huge output rate.
>It depends on the codec efficiency.
>
>
Duh! yeah!
>>Skype uses iLBC.
>>
>>
>
>It's using some globalipsound technology.
>http://www.globalipsound.com/customers_partners/customers_partners.php
>http://www.globalipsound.com/solutions/solutions_Codecs.php
>
>
That's iLBC
>>I think the wideband version of iLBC is 24kbps.
>>
>>
>
>On my PC I have 4 DivX audio codecs for 44KHz : 32, 22, 20 and 16 Kbps
>
>
Many things are possible, with variably crappy results. Actually, it
doesn't take many extra bits to code the higher frequencies. The bulk of
the bits concentrate on the first 4kHz.
>I'm sure it's possible to get a streaming 24KHz bdwdth in 24kbps. However
>maybe it's not available for a gnu software.
>
>
The wideband iLBC isn't available for royalty free use, as far as I
know. They only allow the narrowband to be used in that way.
Regards,
Steve
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list