[Asterisk-Dev] Error

Huddleston, Robert RHuddleston at cavtel.com
Tue Aug 24 11:53:28 MST 2004


Anyone experiment with using MGCP endpoints on asterisk... Getting numerous
errors

 Reloading MGCP
  == Parsing '/etc/asterisk/mgcp.conf': Found
  == MGCP Listening on 216.49.73.124:2727
  == Using TOS bits 0
    -- Endpoint 'aaln/1 at 216.49.73.122-1' observed 'hd'
    -- MGCP mgcp_new(MGCP/aaln/1 at 216.49.73.122-1) created in state: Down
Aug 24 14:52:43 NOTICE[1089473088]: chan_mgcp.c:2278 handle_response:
Terminating on result 528 from aaln/1 at 216.49.73.122-1
    -- No command found on [216.49.73.122] for transaction 19. Ignoring...
    -- Endpoint 'aaln/1 at 216.49.73.122-1' observed 'hd'
    -- MGCP mgcp_new(MGCP/aaln/1 at 216.49.73.122-1) created in state: Down
Aug 24 14:54:55 NOTICE[1089473088]: chan_mgcp.c:2278 handle_response:
Terminating on result 528 from aaln/1 at 216.49.73.122-1
    -- No command found on [216.49.73.122] for transaction 22. Ignoring...

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Szmidt [mailto:steve at szmidt.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 12:55 PM
To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Error


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Monday 23 August 2004 09:46 pm, Steven Critchfield wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 12:45, AdyaKamal wrote:
> > Hi There,
> >
> >
> > I got this error, please tell me solution:
> >
> > WARNING[303123]: chan_sip.c:455 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x814ad34 (len
> > 688) to 0.84.197.99 returned -1: Network unreachable
>
> This is a good time to practice english reading comprehension. The
> message is actually very readable. "Network unreachable" means there is
> no way for a packet to reach the IP address you specified.
>
> With that part of the message digested you would look a little deeper
> and see that the IP address looks suspect. I don't know if it is
> possible to have a zero as the first quad of an IP address. While I know
> it is possible for a zero to be in one of the other positions of a IP
> address, the first one I think has to be non zero.

Yes, and I would guess that it's a typo. Probably should be 10.
- -- 
Steve

"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
                                Benjamin Franklin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBK3L/ljK16xgETzkRAiU1AJ99xkH1zc0zfje1sYnoRL2PaBmAggCgyT9m
4KvHpX+G/+O4AFUuW9dhp6M=
=kFpi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev



More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list