[Asterisk-Dev] Re: [Asterisk-cvs] asterisk pbx.c,1.111,1.112

[Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP)]

OK, I'll bite, just this once.
   This was not a complaint - it's an enquiry as there was not enough
   context on bugzilla to understand the reason for the initial decision.
   "Because it's been that way for over a year" doesn't give me the
   reasoning behind the original decision to go case sensitive.
   Nor was it a whine, as there's little point in wasting bandwidth.
atb, L

On 20 Apr 2004, at 8:00 pm, Tilghman Lesher wrote:

> On Sunday 18 April 2004 06:18, Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>    Is there a particular reason why all extension matching should
>> be case sensitive?
>
> Because it's been that way for over a year now.  This patch was to
> resolve a problem that wasn't fixed way back when.
>
>> The bug seems to have come about as Mark didn't want to use a
>> different letter for Absolute and Response timeouts.
>>
>> Are we so short on letters that we need all users to go through and
>> check their extensions.conf? The bugfix certainly works, but is a
>> bit severe, IMHO.
>
> What is the exact nature of your complaint, or are you just whining to
> hear yourself whine?
>
> -Tilghman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>

-- 

Visit our website at www.roke.co.uk

Registered Office: Roke Manor Research Ltd, Siemens House, Oldbury, Bracknell,
Berkshire. RG12 8FZ

The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential to
Roke Manor Research Ltd and must not be passed to any third party without
permission. This communication is for information only and shall not create or
change any contractual relationship.