[Asterisk-Dev] Re: [Asterisk-cvs] asterisk pbx.c,1.111,1.112

[Rob Gagnon]

*smiles* as he predicted this in #asterisk-bugs a while ago.

(and I just wanted to waste more space in your inboxes)---noting how 80
some-odd emails were waiting this morning alone... Thanks OEJ and BKW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej at edvina.net>
To: <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Re: [Asterisk-cvs] asterisk pbx.c,1.111,1.112


> Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >   Is there a particular reason why all extension matching should be case
> > sensitive?
> > The bug seems to have come about as Mark didn't want to use a different
> > letter for
> > Absolute and Response timeouts.
> >
> > Are we so short on letters that we need all users to go through and
> > check their
> > extensions.conf? The bugfix certainly works, but is a bit severe, IMHO.
> >
> Maybe we should open up for backwards compatibility and add
> 'I' and 'H' and 'O' as synonyms.
>
> /O
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>