[Asterisk-Dev] Performance bottleneck in voicemail2 on nfsed huge mailboxes

[Steven Critchfield]

On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 10:33, Levent Guendogdu wrote:
> ... another "workaround" just popped into my mind, which would be
> simpler to implement IMHO:
> 
> after playing the beep, record the voicemail audio to a (some) tmp
> file(s), like 
> 
> /tmp/<currentsystemtime>.gsm
> 
> After hangup, look for the next msg num and save the meta file and
> voicemail.
> 
> Sounds good to me for a first step, if no one objects, I'll patch this.

Or a more scalable method that would also help out for a project that
Tilghman needs, just name the messages with the epoch of creation and
maybe a md5 of the caller id. This would let you create the filename in
a method that is sortable and pretty much guaranteed to be unique
without consulting the filesystem first. This also should make the
filenames unique enough to bounce from mailbox to mailbox without
renaming. Also you could delete a message and still have the gap filled.
BTW, if MySQL is the answer than you probably are asking the wrong
question.

> On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 17:20, Levent Guendogdu wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > there is a performance bottleneck in the voicemail2 code where it
> > determines the next message number for the voicemail by checking for
> > filename existance. On my K6/400 * box, which serves only a few
> > mailboxes, this takes up to two seconds. So, logically, because this
> > occurs after the BEEP has already been played to the caller, the first
> > two seconds of the message are being dropped.
> > 
> > I've seen the addition of mysql support in voicemail2. How about storing
> > the currenct msg num in mysql, too? 
> > 
> > Or adding some sort of index file for a mail box which contains the last
> > msg num.
> > 
> > I see that, if you delete message in between, the current code would
> > simply "fill the gap" by numbering the next incoming voicemail to the
> > "first free" one. 
> > 
> > To bring both worlds together I'd suggest switching to a voicemail
> > message id instead of msg num.
> > 
> > What do you people think?
> > 
> > Levon.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> > Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
-- 
Steven Critchfield <critch at basesys.com>