[asterisk-commits] dvossel: trunk r271977 - /trunk/channels/chan_sip.c
SVN commits to the Asterisk project
asterisk-commits at lists.digium.com
Tue Jun 22 15:37:10 CDT 2010
Author: dvossel
Date: Tue Jun 22 15:37:05 2010
New Revision: 271977
URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk?view=rev&rev=271977
Log:
ignore CANCEL request after having already received final response to INVITE
RFC 3261 section 9 states that a CANCEL has no effect on a
request to a UAS that has already given a final response. This
patch checks to make sure there is a pending invite before
allowing a CANCEL request to be processed, otherwise it responds
to the CANCEL with a "481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist".
Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/697/
Modified:
trunk/channels/chan_sip.c
Modified: trunk/channels/chan_sip.c
URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk/channels/chan_sip.c?view=diff&rev=271977&r1=271976&r2=271977
==============================================================================
--- trunk/channels/chan_sip.c (original)
+++ trunk/channels/chan_sip.c Tue Jun 22 15:37:05 2010
@@ -23079,7 +23079,14 @@
req->ignore = 1;
ast_debug(3, "Ignoring SIP message because of retransmit (%s Seqno %d, ours %d)\n", sip_methods[p->method].text, p->icseq, seqno);
}
-
+
+ /* RFC 3261 section 9. "CANCEL has no effect on a request to which a UAS has
+ * already given a final response." */
+ if (!p->pendinginvite && (req->method == SIP_CANCEL)) {
+ transmit_response(p, "481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist", req);
+ return res;
+ }
+
if (seqno >= p->icseq)
/* Next should follow monotonically (but not necessarily
incrementally -- thanks again to the genius authors of SIP --
More information about the asterisk-commits
mailing list