[asterisk-commits] file: branch 1.4 r87534 - /branches/1.4/apps/app_followme.c

[SVN commits to the Asterisk project]

Author: file
Date: Tue Oct 30 10:10:13 2007
New Revision: 87534

URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&rev=87534
Log:
Return 1.4 to a state where it builds. Changing the arguments to a function and not changing where they are used is bad, mmmk?

Modified:
    branches/1.4/apps/app_followme.c

Modified: branches/1.4/apps/app_followme.c
URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/branches/1.4/apps/app_followme.c?view=diff&rev=87534&r1=87533&r2=87534
==============================================================================
--- branches/1.4/apps/app_followme.c (original)
+++ branches/1.4/apps/app_followme.c Tue Oct 30 10:10:13 2007
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@
 							idx++;
 						numorder = idx;
 					}
-					cur = create_followme_number(numberstr, timeout, numorder);
+					cur = create_followme_number(numberstr, "", timeout, numorder);
 					AST_LIST_INSERT_TAIL(&f->numbers, cur, entry);
 				} else {
 					profile_set_param(f, var->name, var->value, var->lineno, 1);
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@
 				   (and locked) while we're trying to do a follow-me */
 		AST_LIST_HEAD_INIT_NOLOCK(&targs.cnumbers);
 		AST_LIST_TRAVERSE(&f->numbers, nm, entry) {
-			newnm = create_followme_number(nm->number, nm->timeout, nm->order);
+			newnm = create_followme_number(nm->number, "", nm->timeout, nm->order);
 			AST_LIST_INSERT_TAIL(&targs.cnumbers, newnm, entry);
 		}
 		ast_mutex_unlock(&f->lock);