<blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 10px 0; padding: 0 10px;"><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">(3 comments)</p></blockquote><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Hi Sean,</p><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Thank you for your kind reviewing. I've replied your comment. Thanks. :)</p><p><a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/10988">View Change</a></p><p>3 comments:</p><ul style="list-style: none; padding: 0;"><li style="margin: 0; padding: 0;"><p><a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/10988/1/main/rtp_engine.c">File main/rtp_engine.c:</a></p><ul style="list-style: none; padding: 0;"><li style="margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 16px;"><p style="margin-bottom: 4px;"><a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/10988/1/main/rtp_engine.c@92">Patch Set #1, Line 92:</a> <code style="font-family:monospace,monospace"> interarrival time, measured in milliseconds.</para></code></p><p><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 10px 0; padding: 0 10px;">I don't see any indication from RFC 3550 that this will always be milliseconds.</blockquote></p><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">You're right. I was wrong. I was digging a lot after your comment, to trying to find the comment about this 'millisecond'. But I was wrong.</p><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">After digging the RFC 3550 and others, it turns out It's not the kind of second or milliseconds things. It's timestamp unit itself.</p><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">In my understanding, it depends on the codec-sampling rate. If the codec is G.711, the sampling rate is 8000 Hz. So, the timestamp unit for the G.711 is, 1/8000 second.</p></li><li style="margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 16px;"><p style="margin-bottom: 4px;"><a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/10988/1/main/rtp_engine.c@100">Patch Set #1, Line 100:</a> <code style="font-family:monospace,monospace"> <para>The delay, expressed in units of 1/65536 seconds(each unit is ~0.000015 seconds)</code></p><p><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 10px 0; padding: 0 10px;">I don't think this clarification is necessary. The 'X/Y something' notation is well understood.</blockquote></p><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Yes, that's good enough. :)</p></li><li style="margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 16px;"><p style="margin-bottom: 4px;"><a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/10988/1/main/rtp_engine.c@123">Patch Set #1, Line 123:</a> <code style="font-family:monospace,monospace"> <para>Calculated Round-Trip Time in milliseconds</para></code></p><p><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #aaa; margin: 10px 0; padding: 0 10px;">Have you confirmed that this is milliseconds and not seconds (or 'timestamp units' for that matter)?</blockquote></p><p style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Second is correct. I was just confused, because in my test, RTT was over 4000, which doesn't make sense. But actually, the description is correct. 4000 sec of RTT caused by some other bug.</p></li></ul></li></ul><p>To view, visit <a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/10988">change 10988</a>. To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit <a href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings">settings</a>.</p><div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/EmailMessage"><div itemscope itemprop="action" itemtype="http://schema.org/ViewAction"><link itemprop="url" href="https://gerrit.asterisk.org/10988"/><meta itemprop="name" content="View Change"/></div></div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Project: asterisk </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Branch: master </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-MessageType: comment </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Change-Id: I4f306e8214ea86a606c7d5537acdc62b0db14e51 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Change-Number: 10988 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Owner: sungtae kim <pchero21@gmail.com> </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation (1000185) </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua C. Colp <jcolp@digium.com> </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Reviewer: Sean Bright <sean.bright@gmail.com> </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Reviewer: sungtae kim <pchero21@gmail.com> </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:31:41 +0000 </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-HasComments: Yes </div>
<div style="display:none"> Gerrit-HasLabels: No </div>