[Asterisk-code-review] res_crypto: Use EVP API's instead of legacy API's (asterisk[master])

Philip Prindeville asteriskteam at digium.com
Mon May 16 14:58:23 CDT 2022


Attention is currently required from: Sean Bright, Stanislav Abramenkov, George Joseph.
Philip Prindeville has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18534 )

Change subject: res_crypto: Use EVP API's instead of legacy API's
......................................................................


Patch Set 18:

(1 comment)

File res/res_rtp_asterisk.c:

https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18534/comment/c695a912_557fb0d4 
PS8, Line 49: #ifdef HAVE_OPENSSL
> Yeah, I think res_crypto.c requires it as well.  At least for 3.x.  Putting it back.
BTW, just compiled and tested against Openssl 3.0 (3.0.4-dev specifically) and it worked just fine.



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/18534
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5c738756de75fd27ebad54be144c0ac6193f21b2
Gerrit-Change-Number: 18534
Gerrit-PatchSet: 18
Gerrit-Owner: Philip Prindeville <philipp at redfish-solutions.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-Reviewer: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sean Bright <sean at seanbright.com>
Gerrit-CC: Stanislav Abramenkov <stas.abramenkov at gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Sean Bright <sean at seanbright.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Stanislav Abramenkov <stas.abramenkov at gmail.com>
Gerrit-Attention: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 19:58:23 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Sean Bright <sean at seanbright.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Philip Prindeville <philipp at redfish-solutions.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20220516/aca2f1c3/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-code-review mailing list