[Asterisk-code-review] time: add support for time64 libcs (asterisk[master])
Philip Prindeville
asteriskteam at digium.com
Fri Feb 25 17:19:42 CST 2022
Attention is currently required from: Joshua Colp, George Joseph, Kevin Harwell, Sebastian Kemper.
Philip Prindeville has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16621 )
Change subject: time: add support for time64 libcs
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS4:
> There are currently two patches up for review regarding this issue. […]
I'm inclined to agree. There are two paths forward:
(1) don't support compilers that ship with non-C99 compliant headers;
(2) add #ifdef PRId32 (et al) logic to time.h but that seems like extra work for little benefit.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16621
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic8d61b26033f5c486b917e738c9608b0923a844e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16621
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Sebastian Kemper <sebastian_ml at gmx.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Philip Prindeville <philipp at redfish-solutions.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Sean Bright <sean at seanbright.com>
Gerrit-CC: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-CC: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Joshua Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com>
Gerrit-Attention: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Sebastian Kemper <sebastian_ml at gmx.net>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 23:19:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20220225/b10bf408/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list