[Asterisk-code-review] spelling: anyway (asterisk[master])
Josh Soref
asteriskteam at digium.com
Sun Nov 7 00:03:39 CDT 2021
Josh Soref has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16729 )
Change subject: spelling: anyway
......................................................................
spelling: anyway
Change-Id: Ib141be00be7a4c8b922eac48a087612ea096c54e
---
M main/astfd.c
M main/smoother.c
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.asterisk.org:29418/asterisk refs/changes/29/16729/1
diff --git a/main/astfd.c b/main/astfd.c
index 8322803..78efe11 100644
--- a/main/astfd.c
+++ b/main/astfd.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@
}
/* On success, newfd will be closed automatically if it was already
* open. We don't need to mention anything about that, we're updating
- * the value anway. */
+ * the value anyway. */
STORE_COMMON(res, "dup2", "%d,%d", oldfd, newfd); /* res == newfd */
return res;
}
diff --git a/main/smoother.c b/main/smoother.c
index 5c58f83..ba45af4 100644
--- a/main/smoother.c
+++ b/main/smoother.c
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
/* Move remaining data to the front if applicable */
if (s->len) {
/* In principle this should all be fine because if we are sending
- G.729 VAD, the next timestamp will take over anyawy */
+ G.729 VAD, the next timestamp will take over anyway */
memmove(s->data, s->data + len, s->len);
if (!ast_tvzero(s->delivery)) {
/* If we have delivery time, increment it, otherwise, leave it at 0 */
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16729
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ib141be00be7a4c8b922eac48a087612ea096c54e
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16729
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Josh Soref <jsoref at gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20211107/0632c686/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list