[Asterisk-code-review] spelling: actually (asterisk[master])
Josh Soref
asteriskteam at digium.com
Sun Nov 7 00:03:03 CDT 2021
Josh Soref has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16702 )
Change subject: spelling: actually
......................................................................
spelling: actually
Change-Id: Ibc314160370dbaa0b0701666cbf5c3b804b2b4f6
---
M main/abstract_jb.c
M main/ccss.c
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.asterisk.org:29418/asterisk refs/changes/02/16702/1
diff --git a/main/abstract_jb.c b/main/abstract_jb.c
index 083ff9e..03dd022 100644
--- a/main/abstract_jb.c
+++ b/main/abstract_jb.c
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@
timestamp_diff = (frame->ts * (rate / 1000)) - stream_sync->timestamp;
} else {
/* Video is special - internally we reference it as 1000 to preserve the RTP timestamp but
- * it is actualy 90000, this is why we can just directly subtract the timestamp.
+ * it is actually 90000, this is why we can just directly subtract the timestamp.
*/
rate = 90000;
timestamp_diff = frame->ts - stream_sync->timestamp;
diff --git a/main/ccss.c b/main/ccss.c
index d5bce3a..c693322 100644
--- a/main/ccss.c
+++ b/main/ccss.c
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@
* for recall. If a CCNR request comes in, then we will
* have to mark the list as unfit for recall since this
* is a clear indicator that the person at the monitored
- * device has gone away and is actuall not fit to be
+ * device has gone away and is actually not fit to be
* recalled
*/
int fit_for_recall;
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16702
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibc314160370dbaa0b0701666cbf5c3b804b2b4f6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16702
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Josh Soref <jsoref at gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20211107/e89cb1b1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list