[Asterisk-code-review] spelling: actually (asterisk[master])

Josh Soref asteriskteam at digium.com
Sun Nov 7 00:03:03 CDT 2021


Josh Soref has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16702 )


Change subject: spelling: actually
......................................................................

spelling: actually

Change-Id: Ibc314160370dbaa0b0701666cbf5c3b804b2b4f6
---
M main/abstract_jb.c
M main/ccss.c
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)



  git pull ssh://gerrit.asterisk.org:29418/asterisk refs/changes/02/16702/1

diff --git a/main/abstract_jb.c b/main/abstract_jb.c
index 083ff9e..03dd022 100644
--- a/main/abstract_jb.c
+++ b/main/abstract_jb.c
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@
 		timestamp_diff = (frame->ts * (rate / 1000)) - stream_sync->timestamp;
 	} else {
 		/* Video is special - internally we reference it as 1000 to preserve the RTP timestamp but
-		 * it is actualy 90000, this is why we can just directly subtract the timestamp.
+		 * it is actually 90000, this is why we can just directly subtract the timestamp.
 		 */
 		rate = 90000;
 		timestamp_diff = frame->ts - stream_sync->timestamp;
diff --git a/main/ccss.c b/main/ccss.c
index d5bce3a..c693322 100644
--- a/main/ccss.c
+++ b/main/ccss.c
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@
 	 * for recall. If a CCNR request comes in, then we will
 	 * have to mark the list as unfit for recall since this
 	 * is a clear indicator that the person at the monitored
-	 * device has gone away and is actuall not fit to be
+	 * device has gone away and is actually not fit to be
 	 * recalled
 	 */
 	int fit_for_recall;

-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/16702
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibc314160370dbaa0b0701666cbf5c3b804b2b4f6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 16702
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: Josh Soref <jsoref at gmail.com>
Gerrit-CC: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20211107/e89cb1b1/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the asterisk-code-review mailing list