[Asterisk-code-review] res_pjsip_diversion: implement support for History-Info (asterisk[16])

George Joseph asteriskteam at digium.com
Wed Sep 2 10:13:55 CDT 2020


George Joseph has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/14729 )

Change subject: res_pjsip_diversion: implement support for History-Info
......................................................................


Patch Set 10:

(1 comment)

https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/14729/10/res/res_pjsip_diversion.c 
File res/res_pjsip_diversion.c:

https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/14729/10/res/res_pjsip_diversion.c@654 
PS10, Line 654: 		add_supported(tdata);
> if the leg doesn't have history_info enabled, then it should be considered as no supported I would imagine

Two separate things though... 
Do we accept history info from the remote?  If so, we need to set the Supported tag.
Do we send history info to the remote?

Do we need two options then?   send_history_info and accept_history_info?  Or maybe just one named allow_history_info or something along those lines?



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/14729
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: 16
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2296369582d4b295c5ea1e60bec391dd1d318fa6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 14729
Gerrit-PatchSet: 10
Gerrit-Owner: Torrey Searle <tsearle at gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-Reviewer: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 15:13:55 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Torrey Searle <tsearle at gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20200902/48e514a3/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-code-review mailing list