[Asterisk-code-review] res pjsip session: properly handle SDP from a forked call wi... (asterisk[master])
Jenkins2
asteriskteam at digium.com
Mon Mar 12 07:23:27 CDT 2018
Jenkins2 has submitted this change and it was merged. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/8379 )
Change subject: res_pjsip_session: properly handle SDP from a forked call with early media
......................................................................
res_pjsip_session: properly handle SDP from a forked call with early media
In handle_negotiated_sdp(), use session->active_media_state when
session->pending_media_state is empty. The 200's SDP should be fed into
handle_negotiated_sdp_session_media() together with the already negotiated
state, which is now in session->active_media_state instead. Only if both
the session's pending and active media are empty should
handle_negotiated_sdp() abort.
ASTERISK-27441
Change-Id: If0d5150ffe6f38d8a854831fef37942258d4629c
---
M res/res_pjsip_session.c
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Richard Mudgett: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
Joshua Colp: Looks good to me, approved
Jenkins2: Approved for Submit
diff --git a/res/res_pjsip_session.c b/res/res_pjsip_session.c
index fcd190b..f252017 100644
--- a/res/res_pjsip_session.c
+++ b/res/res_pjsip_session.c
@@ -876,15 +876,30 @@
struct ast_stream_topology *topology;
unsigned int changed = 0;
- /* This situation can legitimately happen when an SDP is received in a
- * 183 Session Progress message. In that case, everything's been done
- * by the time this function is called and there are no more pending
- * streams.
- */
if (!session->pending_media_state->topology) {
- ast_debug(1, "Pending topology was NULL for channel '%s'\n",
- session->channel ? ast_channel_name(session->channel) : "unknown");
- return 0;
+ if (session->active_media_state->topology) {
+ /*
+ * This happens when we have negotiated media after receiving a 183,
+ * and we're now receiving a 200 with a new SDP. In this case, there
+ * is active_media_state, but the pending_media_state has been reset.
+ */
+ struct ast_sip_session_media_state *active_media_state_clone;
+
+ active_media_state_clone =
+ ast_sip_session_media_state_clone(session->active_media_state);
+ if (!active_media_state_clone) {
+ ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Unable to clone active media state for channel '%s'\n",
+ session->channel ? ast_channel_name(session->channel) : "unknown");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ ast_sip_session_media_state_free(session->pending_media_state);
+ session->pending_media_state = active_media_state_clone;
+ } else {
+ ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "No pending or active media state for channel '%s'\n",
+ session->channel ? ast_channel_name(session->channel) : "unknown");
+ return -1;
+ }
}
/* If we're handling negotiated streams, then we should already have set
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/8379
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Gerrit-Change-Id: If0d5150ffe6f38d8a854831fef37942258d4629c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 8379
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins2
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lvl <digium at lvlconsultancy.nl>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20180312/c65a785f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list