[Asterisk-code-review] core: Remove ABI effects of MALLOC DEBUG. (asterisk[master])
Corey Farrell
asteriskteam at digium.com
Fri Feb 23 06:47:59 CST 2018
Corey Farrell has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/8366 )
Change subject: core: Remove ABI effects of MALLOC_DEBUG.
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
> (2 comments)
>
> > (1 comment)
> >
> > This may be crazy but how much of a performance hit would we take
> > if __ast_calloc et al were always real functions provided by
> > main/astmm.c instead of AST_INLINE_API in utils.h? Then just
> have
> > the implementation of main/astmm.c chosen by `#if
> defined(MALLOC_DEBUG)`.
> > I know there would be a hit, I'm just not sure it's prohibitive.
>
> I'd like to do that since it would reduce the inline code bloat.
> However,
> something would need to be done about the varying definitions of
> MALLOC_FAILURE_MSG. That would need to be another patch though.
>
> I do think we overuse inline functions. They are supposed to
> provide
> benefit when the overhead of calling a function is more than the
> time needed to execute the function itself. This means that
> inlined
> functions should be tiny. e.g., Value accessor functions.
I just wrote a follow-up patch to remove all allocation AST_INLINE_API functions from utils.h and put them into astmm.c. I will post once this review is merged, I just wanted to mention this now so you do not duplicate the work I've done.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/8366
To unsubscribe, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic07ad80b2c2df894db984cf27b16a69383ce0e10
Gerrit-Change-Number: 8366
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Corey Farrell <git at cfware.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins2
Gerrit-Reviewer: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:47:59 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20180223/4a41149a/attachment.html>
More information about the asterisk-code-review
mailing list